You're aware, I'm sure, of the idea of the "law of attraction?" It's a a new age-y idea that people's negative or positive thoughts are responsible for bringing negative or positive experiences into their lives.
Personally, I believe in the power of positive thinking, and I've seen the power of prayer. But, I can feel my skeptical face form when we start talking about the idea that people who have rough lives have simply brought it on themselves with their negativity.
That's probably why I was drawn to what Jess Stillman has to share with us today, which is about the "law of subtraction." It's a little bit easier to believe and embrace, in my estimation. In keeping with the theme, I think I'll strip out the rest of this introduction and get right to it. Here's Jess:
Scientists did an experiment not too long ago where they asked volunteers to solve problems like stabilizing a shaky Lego tower or figuring out geometric puzzles.
Almost always, they observed, the study subjects tried to add something to find a solution. This was true even when taking away bricks or shapes was objectively the faster, easier way to solve the problem. The scientists called this phenomenon "subtraction bias" and declared it a shared feature of the human mind -- sort of a bias against subtraction; people just tend to try to solve problems by addition rather than subtraction.
What holds true of engineering challenges and brainteasers also holds true of happiness (and intelligence), too. If you're someone who would like to be happier in your work and life, chances are excellent your first impulse will be to add something.
Maybe you could exercise or meditate more? Perhaps a new career direction would solve your woes? Yes, we can improve well-being by adding joy to our lives. But we can also achieve the same aim by subtracting misery, and to review the idea, we can look to the work of the great philosopher and Nobel laureate Bertrand Russell (1872-1970), as channeled by Harvard happiness researcher Arthur Brooks recently in The Atlantic.
What practices or habits should be on the chopping block if you want to stop overlooking the subtractive approach to greater happiness? Here are a few of them. For thematic reasons, I think we should count them down backward.
Melancholy was all the rage in Victorian times, and there are plenty of circles today in which acting grumpy and cynical is taken as a sign of depth and intelligence. Choosing moodiness to look cool was dumb then, continued to be dumb in Russell's time, when he mocked it mercilessly, and is dumb now.
Russell believed that "what most people fear is not falling into destitution but 'that they will fail to outshine their neighbors,'" Brooks explains. Keeping up with the Jones is a never-ending game that can lead to lifelong discontent. And if you don't believe the Nobel laureate, there's modern science to prove it. The solution to social comparison, according to Russell, is to "focus on what you have and feel grateful."
Closely linked to the above mistake, envy is the condition of feeling bad because someone else has more than you. Russell's proposed this cure for envy: "Whoever wishes to increase human happiness must wish to increase admiration." Rather than suffer because of other people's excellence, celebrate and learn from it.
"We are less bored than our ancestors were," Russell wrote in 1930, "but we are more afraid of boredom." Imagine what he would have made of the smartphone era! But the truth is, no gadget or streaming service can fully save you from boredom. They can, however, distract you from essential but uncomfortable reflection and creative growth. The solution is to fight to regain your capacity to just sit quietly and notice the world around you.
Anxiety has only increased since Russell's day, and it remains a thief of joy. "Russell believed that anxiety is rooted in fear of 'some danger which we are unwilling to face,'" Brooks notes before highlighting modern science on the biological basis of anxiety disorders. But whatever the cause of your free-floating fear, not going to the effort of finding ways to tame it will make you miserable. Russell -- and Tim Ferriss -- suggests the best cure is forcing yourself to mentally face your fears until they lose some of their terror.
Should you feel guilty and make amends if you did something wrong and hurt someone? Of course, but Russell argued against a baseless sense of sin or feeling guilty just because you are doing well and others are doing less well.
Russell again feels ahead of his time with his warnings against playing the victim. "Russell was critical of what he called 'persecution mania,' in which one is 'perpetually the victim of ingratitude, unkindness, and treachery.' One version of this is what some researchers have called 'virtuous victimhood,'" explains Brooks. Of course, sometimes people really are victims of injustice, but putting unending victimhood at the heart of your identity is a recipe for unhappiness.
According to hospice nurses and others who work with the dying, among the most common deathbed regrets is living a life you thought others expected of you rather than one that was true to you. Russell apparently would not have been surprised.
"One should as a rule respect public opinion in so far as is necessary to avoid starvation and to keep out of prison," he wrote, "but anything that goes beyond this is voluntary submission to an unnecessary tyranny."
| Join in the comments |
(Today's newsletter continues after the main sponsor's message below. Want to learn about sponsoring Understandably? I'd love to have you. Get in touch here to learn more!)
Thanks for reading, and a special welcome to the new readers who subscribed to Understandably since the last edition of this newsletter! Jess wrote about some of this before at Inc.com. See you bright and early tomorrow.
Big Optimism
Quick note: Big Optimism is getting a new home. I'm rolling it into my other newsletter, Understandably. So Big Optimism will become a regular Monday feature. If you're already subscribed to Understandably, you're all set—you'll keep getting these optimistic history essays every Monday, right alongside everything else. If you're not subscribed to Understandably (or not sure), click the link below and I'll add you. (And yes, the Big Optimism book is still coming—more on that soon.) Honestly, I...
BIG NEWS before we dive in ... I'm writing a Big Optimism book! As a loyal subscriber, you can get an advance copy for free. How? With the one-click link below. Click that and I'll put you on the list for a free advance copy, and also bring you over to the new home of Big Optimism on Substack. This will be your only chance to come along! I hope you'll click the link (just click it; that's all you have to do) and keep moving forward with me on this optimistic journey. Yes! Keep sending me Big...
November 2, 2025 "Regardless of what actually happened after the first game, football was here to stay." - Rutgers University official account ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ Please let me know here if you can't see the ads. You can ignore the fact that the webpage might not load — just clicking the link tells me! ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ 159 years It's college football season, and you might wonder just how long we've been doing this. Intercollegiate sports in America started with rowing: Harvard and Yale raced on Lake...